>I have a friend that tends to express his ideas about everything in the jargon of a securities trader. Of course, this is probably because he has been a very successful trader, both in bull and bear markets, for many years. “Every trend in history, even liberty, can be charted like a stock,” he has often observed. I tend to agree.
As any trader will tell you, bull markets do not go straight up and bear markets do not go straight down. Rather, they tend to meander in the direction that they are headed. During a long-term bull market, a trend will have major pull-backs and long periods of consolidation. It is the experienced trader that knows how to “buy low and sell high,” taking advantage of the back and forth action of a stock or a sector on its journey. However, even wiser is the investor that can spot the trend at the beginning and keep buying lows without having to attempt to time the market and sell at all. The legendary Jim Rogers has often said that he is “the world’s worst short-term trader.” He would rather buy something that he can own forever than buy with the intention of having to sell.
Gold has been the most spectacular bull market over the past decade. Like all trends, it had periods of dramatic rise, followed by sharp pullbacks that gave back a portion of the gains, and then long periods of consolidation. Once a consolidation was over, another dramatic rise in price followed. The first run began at the beginning of the decade, with gold selling under $300 per ounce. It ran up to over $700 per ounce in 2006 before pulling back sharply under $600. The price then consolidated there for an entire year before the next leg up began. That second leg ran all of the way over $1,000 per ounce before pulling back to the low $700’s. Again, there was a long consolidation before this latest run, which will take gold we know not where.
All of the movements in the price have explainable reasons. When the fundamentals are stronger than the actual price of the security or commodity, investors begin buying. Once the price starts to move up, traders begin wading in to make profits on the movement of the price, both up and down. At any given time, there are those who are long and those who are short. Contrary to the nonsense you hear from government officials and their kept economists, short sellers play a vital role in keeping the market healthy. When a stock, commodity, or sector beings to fall in price, short sellers help stabilize that price because they have to buy the stock that they sold short to cover their short sales.
You will often hear the wisest of investors say that a trend is about to reverse when there is no longer any disagreement about it. When everyone is positive on a stock or a bull market, it is about to go down. When everyone is negative, it is about to make a run up. When all of society agreed that the NASDAQ would never go down – when every conversation in every coffee shop, supermarket, or dinner party revolved around the wonderful opportunities in technology stocks, wise investors knew it was time to get out.
Of course, this is not some sort of market magic or voodoo. It is simple cause and effect. When there are few sellers in a market and many buyers, the price is going to be inflated far beyond its value. From an opposite standpoint, when short sellers are forced out of the market in a “short squeeze,” there is now nothing to stop the price from falling precipitously once it starts to fall. With no short sellers covering their shorts, the price falls like a stone. Thus, at the end of long bull market, a bubble usually develops, characterized by a final, parabolic “blow off top,” followed by an equally dramatic drop in price.
The past 100 years has been a bull market for government. While the seeds of the run were sown in the mid-19th century, the bull market in government really began at the turn of the 20th century. The first signs of the bull could be spotted as early as the (Teddy) Roosevelt administration, but the real advances came under Woodrow Wilson. The income tax, the Federal Reserve, and the 17th Amendment were advances in government that made gold’s move from $275 to $700 look tame.
There was then a period of consolidation during the so-called Roaring Twenties. It was not so much a pull-back of government as a slow-down in the pace of its growth. Under three Republican presidents, the government bull market consolidated as Americans convinced themselves that they had restored a free market (because the Republicans said they did, despite their actual support of big government fundamentals).
The next big move came during the Great Depression. While the stock market and the real economy went south, government went on another tear as FDR fully instituted the modern welfare state, the fascist regulatory structure, and took America to war. After 16 years of absolute misery, even the most enthusiastic government bull must have thought it was time for a pullback. It was brief, but it came.
Americans again elected a Republican president in the 1950’s and convinced themselves that they had restored the American system and rejected the big government philosophy of FDR and his liberals. However, this, too, was only another consolidation. In actuality, it was Eisenhower that paved the way for LBJ’s Great Society by creating the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (now the Department of Health and Human Services). The 1950’s are fondly remembered as a period of (mostly) peace and prosperity for America. It was only another consolidation period for government’s century-long bull run.
The next great move came during the 1960’s, when LBJ again lead a tremendous run up for government. Medicare and Medicaid, the other two entitlement monsters that will eventually combine with Social Security to bankrupt the United States, were born during this fabulous period for big government. The move ran right through a two-term Republican presidency (counting Ford’s mop-up after Nixon’s resignation) and into the Carter administration.
Most bull markets have two legs. Some have three, but usually no more than that. It seemed like that axiom would hold true for government as Ronald Reagan gave his first inaugural address. “In this crisis,” he told us, “government is not the solution to our problems – government is the problem.” It was the greatest inaugural speech of the 20th century. The government bull market was over. Or so we thought.
We now know that government didn’t get smaller during the Reagan years, but much bigger. However, there was at least a feeling of negativity about government during the Reagan-Bush years that even forced Bill Clinton to pass himself off as a free-market friendly centrist. It was another consolidation period, with a seemingly impossible fourth leg to follow.
We are in the midst of that fourth leg now, as government makes a more precipitous run up than at any time in history. In a few short years, the government will have nationalized the banking, auto, and health care industries. There are no more government bears to be found anywhere, either among Republican or Democratic politicians or (let’s face it) among 99% of the citizenry. Outside of a tiny constituency of libertarians, paleo-conservatives, and anarchists, there are absolutely no non-believers in government left. The rise is accelerating too fast for any protest or community organizing to stop. It’s a short squeeze as the government bull stampedes.
While this might be a terrifying period for anyone remotely interested in living his own life, there is much reason to be hopeful. As most bull markets eventually do, government is experiencing a blow-off top. The curve has bent straight up, with nary a short to be found in any political party or in any bowling alley or church social. Americans have convinced themselves that government either “should” or “must” do something about absolutely everything. We should expect the run to pick up speed, as government invades every aspect of our lives. Never before – not even in the most barbarous ages – has government made such enormous claims upon the life, liberty, or property of its subjects. Medieval serfs were taxed less. Ancient slaves were freer. Not even the brutal Romans killed with such efficiency and on such a scale.
For all of these reasons, it is about to end. With almost uncontested faith in government, its role has expanded so far beyond what it is actually able to deliver that soon we will see a fall that will make the real estate meltdown look like a mild pullback. Having rode the last leg of the move and squeezed out the last of the shorts, government is about to remind everyone that it not only should not be providing what it is attempting to provide, but that it cannot provide it.
At the moment that the whole world has accepted that government will centrally plan all of the economy, take care of its citizens from cradle to grave, and rule a worldwide military empire –all with money that comes from nowhere – at that very moment the age of government will end. The end is going to come fast, too, just like the end of the bull markets in technology stocks and real estate. Ben Bernanke will still be telling government bulls that there is nothing to worry about long past the moment when his time is up. That’s how fast it’s going to be. As in any market, the moment when every bear is gone is the moment that the bull run is over.
This will not be a pleasant experience. No correction ever is. Fortunes will be lost (albeit mostly fortunes dishonestly made), but innocent people will be hurt, too. All of society will come to the realization that government really can’t provide anything, beyond the brute force that is only justified in self defense. It may take a generation to repair the damage. It’s going to be rough.
However, we should remember one thing. When a bubble deflates, the capital that is not destroyed seeks another refuge. When the NASDAQ melted down and the U.S. dollar began to implode, the smart money fled to gold. It will be no different during the bursting of the government bubble. With a precipitous fall in government, there is an equally dramatic rise in its opposite – liberty.
Americans will have to forego the ill-gotten gains provided by government and do with less while they rebuild. That is unavoidable. While the NASDAQ bubble actually started on a real foundation, the fundamentals of the government bubble were never real. It was all an illusion and it is five minutes from ending.
It’s going to be great.
© Thomas Mullen 2010
>Yes Tom, I agree with you and your friend's assessment of the times. I am greatly encouraged by Brown's win in the bay state, however, America is in need of great leaders like Reagan and JFK. Leaders who rise above the fray and hoopla to set a new course for the nation. I hope Brown and any others that are in the wings can fill those shoes.
>JFK may have been a great President, thus his murder…but Reagan? He was a great ACTOR convincing everyone he was a great President and apparently did a good job of it. When I hear folks talk about him, he is always referred to as somewhat great. He was a fake, but a good fake, in the sense of why he was there. We need men like Ron Paul, Rand Paul and others that want to take government back to the level the founding fathers set it up in the first place.
The other day, my son who just turned 18 went down to get his serial number…you know, the "Social Security" number which is for all effect a SERIAL NUMBER that SOMEONE SOMEWHERE HAS deemed needs to be on the SLAVES. TO get the number it said the requirement was a Birth certificate (Which Obama has yet to produce to be President) a drivers license. What did "they" ask for? Those two pieces of paper PLUS a copy of his DENTAL RECORDS and HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT! WTF FOR? Personally I am sick and tired of ANYONE who wants to know about me. PERIOD.
And here was another one…when he went to get his drivers license updated, he couldn't just sign an affidavit saying he didn't' have a serial number yet, he had to go to the Socialist Security department and GET A LETTER showing he never had one. So NOW to "Drive" you will need to PROVIDE a serial number or else not drive. PISSES ME OFF. "They" make it easier and easier for identity theft with this CRAP. Why should I trust ANY OF THEM?? WHY? WOULD SOMEONE TELL ME?
>That is a very long post. I think I agree with the point of it, though.
The faux "recovery" that is going to happen this year will be financed by pure debt spending. That is why the Dems want to raise the debt limit another $1.9 trillion.
2011 will be the start of a plummeting economy that government cannot hide. It will look like a fall almost straight down because the previous years' declines were covered up by government spending.
We should not include government spending in the GDP numbers, I think the result would be more realistic.
>Brown is more of the same, not a significant difference. Real change will not come until both parties are recognized as being irrelevant to what is needed.
>We need leaders like Andrew Jackson who paid off the Americal debt and ran the bankers out of town.
>Nixon wasn't impeached, he resigned before before congress was able to impeach him.
>The economy already is in the toilet. I've been unemployed for over a year. A job will be posted and a day later will have over a thousand page views. Its unbelievable. The stock market rally has really been fake. I heard the government is the one manipulating the stock market after hours.
>Excellent post!
>Thank you Anonymous – you are correct! I should know, I watched Nixon resign from a hotel room in Toronto, CAN (I was 8 years old an d on vacation with my parents). Thank you also to my friends David Gillie and Mark Barre for pointing out grammatical errors (some of which I already corrected).
I apologize for these lapses my friends. I have been fighting for writing time and wrote this one quickly and late at night. No excuse though!
>I live in Canada. As a kid everything ordinary was made here. Cars, clothes , toasters etc. The exotic stuff came from the UK or the USA. Things will get better when Levi jeans are made in Canada and the USA and the rest of the consumer goods we use daily are also made here in North America. Simple but it is unlikely taught in university.
>I just stumbled across this blog via a link from 321 Gold, and I'm very glad to make your acquaintance.
Your post is the first I've ever seen that takes into account the dire straits we are now in, looks past the current crisis, and sees a positive outcome. (Not to be confused with bubble vision and Wall St. "experts" who also see positive outcomes, but based only on lies and ignorance).
Well done, you are now on my favourites list.
>Tom, excellent post, but you failed to mention one of the biggest problems we are dealing with – corporate fascism. It's not just how much money the government is spending, it's why they are spending it, and where it ultimately goes. Look at where the welfare checks and Medicare/Medicaid dollars end up after being spent (hint: not the average citizen or small businessman). Follow the money to see where the real manipulators of our government (and ultimately the people) are. Reagan played right into their hands, as did Clinton, Bush I and II, and now, Obama.
>Excellent post Tom, I've been expecting the blow off for quite some time and have been quite suprised that the game has lasted this long. Benjamin Franklin said, "Experience will teach a lesson like no other will learn" I think people are going to get a hard slap in the face as they will come to the reality that govt can't provide those needs. Then and only then will we return to the small republic govt our founders intended.
>While I wholeheartedly agree with Tom from a philosophical POV, the reality of what is going to happen shortly after the coming precipitous 'fall', will be anything but more Liberty, unfortunately.
Your government masters know everything that has been said and railed against on blogs like this. To underestimate or count as 'stupidity' or 'shortsightedness', their foreknowledge of events both past, current and future, is to at once be supremely naive.
There are no 'black helicopters' anymore… Because there is no need to hide what the emerging Authoritarian State has planned for the social ramifications of economic 'fall-out'.
All it will take are a few more 'isolated' incidents – like the most recent one in rural Virginia, and the entire country will be willing to surrender it's remaining Liberty teeth in order that the G-man keep them 'safe'.
Unfortunately, the purely 'economic' ramifications of an economic implosion will be the least of worry going forward for those who value Liberty.
It will be tough? No. It will literally be life & death – not for lack of food or shelter, but for lack of cooperating with a desperate, out-of-control Police State.
That… Is what you can look forward to.
>Anonymous,
Thanks for that cheery start to the weekend!
Seriously, though, your take is not without merit. There is the possibility that economic collapse leads to totalitarianism – it's certainly happened plenty of times before.
>Sorry Tom – didn't mean to spoil an otherwise 'happy' Friday, but I digress…
For better or worse, I've always found it better to Expect the worse and hope for the best. At least that way, 'surprises' can be somewhat mitigated by preparation.
I wish we could safely conclude that the post-G-man bubble era would usher in the the true and full capabilities of the human species, with 'Liberty and Justice for All'.
Unfortunately, as goes an economy (primarily: Saving first and spending later) into reverse, so does its social fabric and the ability for a society to agree on an elevated plane of Constitutional principle – that namely being, my rights stop at your nose and vice-versa.
In any event, let that not despair nor discourage us from getting out there and supporting Rand, Ron, Peter and anyone else who has Liberty First as their primary objective.
>No problem, I will suck it up. 😀
When you think of it, though, there are also examples of more liberty after a collapse. When the Soviet Union collapsed, there were many Russians hiring their own security guards because the government couldn't protect them. That's not necessarily good, but it shows that the government was largely incapable of invading their lives as well. Unfortunately, they have probably mistaken the U.S. soft fascist system as "free market capitalism" and largely imitated us, with their own nuances added. There is some reason to hope that American traditions might reassert themselves in a vacuum, since those traditions did exist here at one time. In Russia, their traditions are authoritarian going back a thousand years. Food for thought, anyway.
>Reagan, LBJ, and Wilson were bad presidents??? Next you're going to tell me that Abe Lincoln, the greatest American ever, was bad for the U.S.
Tom, I agree with Anonymous. I know you like to be optimistic (or at least try to convince yourself and others that you're optimistic), but the reality is, it's more likely that government tyranny is just going to get worse.
I don't disagree that everything is about to go to fecal matter, in fact, I would bet it's the plan of many politicians. But when it does, we're not going to get more liberty, we're going to get a lot less. The reason is because that's how they've trained the people to respond.
There is not always a bright side.